The mechanics are mostly simple to do and simple to teach, which is probably why the discussion of them is so prevalent and the discussion of why we do these mechanics is mostly missing. But having only one side of the equation does not allow one to truly handle the issues that dogs have because of our bumbling attempts to train them to live by our rules. I think that is really why there is very little discussion of why - most humans are more interested in exerting control then they are in actually living life. Life is hard, life is unpredictable and life changes constantly. Control and predictability become two of the most important aspects of living.
Therefor, our dogs must conform to this. They must be under control so that we can always predict what they will do. But it's a prediction based on human values and human control and the aversion to change that most humans seem to have - not on what nature has created within a dog. A dog's view of life is very different then a human's. Humans think about things, relate the things of now to the things of the past and the possibilities of the future. Dogs live now, this moment and predict only based on what works and what doesn't. Humans contemplate the future, dogs live in the present. Living in the moment is not a based on whether dogs remember the past, it is based on dogs not thinking about or planning for the future.
These six steps totally ignore most of what I've learned over the years about dogs, wolves, dominance, operant, classical, Pavlovian and Premack conditioning, Skinnerian psychology, psychology in general and the mechanics of teaching a dog sit, stay, come, heel, and down. These six steps fly in the face of conventional dog training and behavior modification no matter which quandrant you normally work with. Almost all that I learned about dog training and behavior modification is about conditioning - you condition the dog to respond to commands, you condition the dog to have a different emotion about a stimulus, you condition a human to give the proper commands and you condition a human to manage a dog's reactivity.
There is only one philosophy that actually addresses what a dog truly is, what a dog really does, how a dog is designed to respond and think by nature, and that is Kevin Behan's Natural Dog Training. And there is only one philosophy that is truly a philosophy and very little "conditioning" happening and that is Cesar Milan and his psychology of dogs. But neither philosophy gives a step by step process whereby the average person can actually rehabilitate a reactive dog.
Kevin's Natural Dog Training is much more comprehensive and explains so much of why a dog does what he does and why we respond the way we do. The problem is that Kevin uses $150 words and concepts that the average human would go unconscious trying to fathom. Neil Sattin and the other Natural Dog Trainers help but they haven't translated more than the basics of what Kevin teaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.